Legal Opinion

Application of Guido H. Stempel, Jr

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 21, 1957No. Patent Appeal 6245PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals in which it affirmed the primary examiner’s rejection of claims 1-4, 12, 14 and 15, and reversed the examiner as to claim 18, which claim was allowed.

Claims 1 and 18 are representative:

“1. An isopropenylbenzene having only two substituents both of which are attached directly to the nuclear carbon atoms and neither of which are attached to carbon atoms next adjacent that carrying the iso-propenyl group; said ■ substituents being further characterized in that they are both ortho-para directing groups which do…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re SteenbockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  2. In re GuastavinoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
  3. In re BurkeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. In Re Jacques Gosteli, Ivan Ernest and Robert B. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
  2. Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. Gerber Garment Technology, Inc. v. Lectra Systems, Inc. And Lectra Systems, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
  5. In Re Alex ZletzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API