Monsanto Company v. Rohm & Haas Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
Monsanto Company appeals from a judgment declaring invalid and unenforceable its U. S. Patent No. 3,382,280, known as the Huffman patent, issued May 7, 1968.1 The action arose in an infringement proceeding Monsanto brought against Rohm and Haas Company, in which the defendant counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment of invalidity and for an injunction and damages for unfair competitive acts against defendant’s allegedly infringing product.2
Preliminarily, we observe that Rohm and Haas, as a defendant in the proceedings below, had the right to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust Actions. Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Rohm and Haas Company v. Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. EllerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Trio Process Corporation, in No. 71-1295 v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc., in No. 71-1296Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Schnading Corporation v. Gaines Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.