Pepper v. Vedova
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marin County. Edgar T. Zook, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action to rescind a contract for the purchase of a team of horses. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant willfully, falsely, fraudulently, and deceitfully stated and represented to the plaintiff the said team of horses of which he was then and there possessed “to be a well matched team, to work together under harness for wagon and general farm work, not balky, no bad habits, physically sound and without fault, blemish, disorder or disease”; that the plaintiff not being a horseman nor experienced in horses or in their purchase, relied and depended upon the defendant’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. GiddingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Hoult v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Merrifield v. McClayOregon Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Morris v. Fiat Motor Sales Co.California Court of Appeal · 1916
- Spiegelman v. EastmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hogan v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Hackett v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.