Legal Opinion
Hogan v. Anthony
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 16, 1919No. Civ. No. 2798PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Plaintiff, upon the judgment-roll alone, appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant.
As appears from the second amended complaint, filed after the decision of this court in a former appeal had by defendant wherein the judgment in favor of plaintiff was reversed (Hogan v. Anthony, 34 Cal. App. 24, [166 Pac. 861]), the parties, on August 13, 1914, executed a contract, the designa tion of which is “Lease and Conditional Sale of Automobile” (the subject thereof being an auto truck), upon which plaintiff at the time paid five hundred dollars in cash, and for the balance of the purchase…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mansfield v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Pepper v. VedovaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
- Hackett v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Hogan v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tatterson v. KehrleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Klein Norton Co. v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Taylor v. S & M Lamp Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Hogan v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Braun v. DallinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924