Legal Opinion

Stockton Savings & Loan Society v. Giddings

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1892No. 14445PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

—This appeal is from the judgment, and was taken within sixty days after its rendition.

The action is upon a non-negotiable promissory note, made by the defendants first sued, and payable to plaintiff. Since suit was commenced, one of the original defendants, E. Giddings, has died, and the defendant, L. M. Giddings, his executrix, has been substituted.

Several separate defenses are pleaded, or attempted to be pleaded, in the answer. They all deny the allegations of the complaint.

In the second they admit making the note, but deny that it was ever delivered to plaintiff, and aver that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. . TorranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Roberts v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Chase v. EvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Wade v. ScottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1842
  5. Scroggin v. HollandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1852

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Santa Anita Consol., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  2. Holland Banking Co. v. DicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Jarecki Mfg. Co. v. HindsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. City National Bank of Columbus v. JordanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Menzel v. PrimmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API