Spiegelman v. Eastman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This cause is before the court upon an appeal by the defendant from the judgment entered therein in favor of the plaintiff, and also upon an appeal by the plaintiff from an order granting a new trial after judgment. If the order granting a new trial was properly made, the judgment from which the defendant has appealed falls of its own weight. On the contrary, if the order granting a new trial should be reversed, it follows as a matter of course that the judgment should be affirmed.
This cause was heard before the Honorable T. A. Norton, sitting with a jury, and verdict rendered in favor of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Crocker-Woolworth National Bank v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- State Exch. Bank of Elk City v. National Bank of Commerce of St. LouisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Carroll v. NodineOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Jones v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Abelseth v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Forrest v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Leekley v. ShortSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
- Hewitt v. Security-First Nat. Bk. of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.