Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Phillips Beverage Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 18, 1992No. C2-92-328PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
On appeal from a summary judgment, appellants challenge the trial court’s determination that no enforceable contract existed based upon a letter of intent signed by the parties. Appellants also assert the trial court improperly dismissed their claims for tortious interference with contract, conspiracy to breach a contract, and fraud. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
Phillips Beverage, a Minnesota corporation, employs Edward Phillips, Michael Berns, and Thomas Adamson as corporate officers. Phillips Beverage owns a subsidi ary corporation which in turn owned Phillips of North…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Hamilton v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bebo v. DelanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Bank of Montreal v. Avalon Capital Group, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Richie Company, LLP v. Lyndon Insurance Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Mohrenweiser v. BlomerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Estate of Schoffman v. Central States Diversified, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.