Legal Opinion

Bebo v. Delander

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 7, 2001No. C5-01-199PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.

Appellant argues that the district court erred by granting summary judgment to respondents on - appellant’s tortious-inter-ference-with-contract and defamation claims. Appellant contends that (1) the question of whether his employer suspended his employment creates a genuine issue of material fact; (2) the district court erred by determining that appellant’s claims failed as a matter of law; and (3) the district court abused its discretion by failing to grant his motion to amend the complaint.

We conclude that there is no genuine issue of material fact as to…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Nordling v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1991

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Darby v. SWENSON, INC.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Elkharwily v. Mayo Holding Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  3. Fair Isaac Corp. v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  4. Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  5. Flora v. Firepond, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API