Legal Opinion
Mohrenweiser v. Blomer
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 6, 1998No. CX-97-1231PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY * , Judge.
Appellants contend the trial court erroneously allowed the jury to determine the en- foreeability of a contract that was unenforceable as a matter of law. We agree and reverse.
FACTS
This ease arose out of two agreements to purchase the Blomer farm. Respondents Mavis and Paul Blomer owned a 160-acre farm in Mille Lacs County. In 1993, the Blomers approached their neighbors, appellants Gordon and Lynn Stalker, about purchasing Blomers’ farm. The Stalkers expressed interest.
Mavis Blomer contacted her local realtor, who drafted a purchase agreement for the $30,000…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Marso v. Mankato Clinic, Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Ohio Calculating, Inc. v. Cpt Corporation, Ohio Calculating, Inc. v. Cpt CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Consolidated Grain & Barge Co. v. MadgettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Hansen v. Phillips Beverage Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- C & S Acquisitions Corp., Successor by Assignment of Cis Corporation v. Northwest Aircraft, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Durham Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated.North Carolina Business Court · 2003
- Richie Company, LLP v. Lyndon Insurance Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- C & S Acquisitions v. Northwest AircraftCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Richie Co., LLP v. Lyndon Ins. GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003