Legal Opinion
Crawford v. France
California Supreme Court
Decided November 28, 1933No. Docket No. L.A. 14381PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
This action was brought by an architect for a fee claimed to be due him under the terms of a written contract for professional services in connection with the construction of a hotel building. Judgment was rendered for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed.
More specifically, the contract for the plaintiff’s services provided:
“(1) That the Architect is to design a hotel building suitable for the needs of the Owner; is to furnish all necessary preliminary sketches and estimates of cost; is to furnish complete working drawings, specifications and details necessary for the construction of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sivers v. SiversCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Buckner v. A. Leon & Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Kreuzberger v. WingfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Lambert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Blahnik v. Small Farms Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ellis v. KlaffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Chastain v. BelmontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- American Industrial Sales Corp. v. Airscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.