Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Klaff

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1950No. Civ. 17302PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

This action was brought against defendant Adams, as lessee, and defendants Rose and Klaff, as assignees, for rent and for damages for the alleged breach of a covenant in a written lease. The first cause of action of the complaint alleged the violation of a covenant for construction by the lessee of “a building or buildings” on the leased premises. The second cause of action was for unpaid rent in the amount of $375. A nonsuit was entered in favor of Klaff on both counts; judgment went for plaintiffs Ellis against Adams and Rose on the cause of action for unpaid rent, and for defendants on the…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Craig v. ZelianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Germain Fruit Co. v. J. K. Armsby Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Breckinridge v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Casa Herrera, Inc. v. BeydounCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ladas v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Sicor Ltd. v. Cetus Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Steiner v. Mobil Oil Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API