Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Chacon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 30, 1998No. C0-96-1261PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
We determine the appropriate discipline for attorney Jeanne Therese Chacon, convicted twice of passing fraudulent checks, failing to respond to inquiries regarding failure to communicate and the neglect of two client matters and currently under an order of suspension from the practice of law. Chacon has made no effort to have the order vacated or to answer the charges of misconduct. We therefore conclude that the appropriate discipline is disbarment.
In December 1995 the Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) received complaints against Cha-con for…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Matter of Discipline of ReutterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Matter of Discipline of RaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against PottengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against ClappSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
4Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against FarleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against HeinemannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Madsen Marcellus, Jr., a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0344643. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Madsen Marcellus, Jr., a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0344643. ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024