Legal Opinion
Citizens Federal Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 21, 2002No. 92-656 CPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
This case is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on damages, and Plaintiffs’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment on damages. At issue is whether Plaintiffs are precluded as a matter of law from recovering lost profits, restitution, or reliance damages for the Government’s breach of contract regarding the Equitable and the American Savings transactions. For the reasons enumerated below, Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART, and Plaintiffs’ cross-motion is DENIED.
II. Background
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mary Ann Jay and Michael H. Jay, as Legal Representatives of Matthew Michael Jay, Deceased v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- California Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Citizens Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Franklin Federal Savings Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Citizens Financial Services, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.