Legal Opinion
Fifth Third Bank v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 10, 2003No. 95-503CPublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
Defendant has moved for summary judgment, inter alia,1 with respect to all the damages claims in this Winstar case. See United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 U.S. 839, 116 S.Ct. 2432, 135 L.Ed.2d 964 (1996). The issue that has commanded the most attention by the parties in briefing and arguing the motion is whether defendant has demonstrated that plaintiff has failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact that would entitle plaintiff to a trial on its claim for lost profits. Although similar claims have not been resolved on motions for summary judgment, this case,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Fifth Third Bank of Western Ohio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Home Savings of America, F.S.B. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Citizens Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.