Legal Opinion
Citizens Federal Bank, FSB v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 23, 2004No. 92-656CPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*509 OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
This Winstar-related case is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the issue of damages for breach of contract. In a previous opinion, the Court found that Defendant was liable to Plaintiffs, Citizens Federal Bank, FSB, et. al. (“Citizens”) because the contract they entered into with Defendant was breached by the Financial Institution Reform and Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (hereinafter “FIRREA”), Pub.L. No. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183 and its implementing regulations,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Citizens Federal Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Kansas Gas and Electric Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Columbia First Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.