Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Griffin v. Brand

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 30, 1916No. 7847PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Application for mandamus.

1ConcurrenceWade, C. J.

In my opinion, the general scheme of our law contemplates that the review of all final judgments rendered by a judge of the superior court shall he by hill of exceptions; and I therefore question the soundness of the rulings which permit such a judgment to be reviewed otherwise — as would result where an extraordinary motion for a new trial has been entertained and overruled by a judge who thereafter declines to certify to a bill of exceptions complaining of his ruling in refusing the motion, where upon application for mandamus to compel the certification of the bill of exceptions the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. RoanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Malone v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  3. Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. ReidCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Sistrunk v. PendletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  5. White v. ButtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cox v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Henderson v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  4. Boatright v. SpeerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API