Legal Opinion

Harris v. Roan

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 13, 1904PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Application for mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

1. The general rule is that when the refusal of a new trial in a criminal case has been affirmed by this court, no second bill of exceptions can be allowed. The only exception to this general rule is such 51 an extraordinary motion or case ” as is specified in the Civil Code, § 5487.

2. The extraordinary motions or cases contemplated by the statute are such as do not ordinarily occur in the transaction of human affairs ; as, when a man has been convicted of murder, and it afterwards appears that the supposed deceased is still alive, or where one is convicted on the testimony of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cox v. HillyerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Malone v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
  3. Hanye v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. White v. ButtSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Sears ex rel. Baker v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Dick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Coggeshall v. ParkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. King v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API