Legal Opinion

Malone v. Hopkins

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1873PublishedCited by 27 opinions

New trial. Bill of exceptions. Mandamus. Practice in the Supreme Court. Before the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Malone petitioned the Supreme Court for a mandamus nisi requiring the Honorable John L. Hopkins, Judge of the Superior Courts of the Atlanta Circuit, to show cause why a mandamus absolute should not issue directing him to certify the bill of exceptions presented to his decision refusing a new trial in the case of the State against petitioner, lately pending in Pulton Superior Court.

The motion for a new trial was as follows:

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. Harris v. RoanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  3. Patterson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  4. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Coggeshall v. ParkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API