Boatright v. Speer
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. Extraordinary motions for new trials, based solely upon the ground of newly discovered evidence, are viewed by the courts with even less favor than original motions based on such a ground, a stricter rule being applied to the former (Norman v. Goode, 121 Ga. 449, 455, 49 S. E. 268), and such a motion is without merit when the alleged newly discovered evidence, although disclosing some facts not in evidence upon the original trial, is in its general character and bearing merely cumulative to that previously presented, and would scarcely have produced a different result on the ordinary…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Cox v. HillyerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Norman v. GoodeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Patterson v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Evans v. GrierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Henderson v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934