Legal Opinion

Sistrunk v. Pendleton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 13, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

1. In passing upon an application for mandamus to compel a judge to certify a bill of exceptions which is presented in proper form, this court will not look into the merits of any assignment of error therein, made; but mandamus will not lie to compel the trial judge to sign and certify a bill which is so defective in form as to necessitate a dismissal of the writ of error in case it should be certified and brought to this court.

2. It appearing that persons who are essential parties to a bill of exceptions sued out in this case are neither named nor designated as such in the bill presented,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Orr v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. Farr v. FarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Toccoa Electric Power Co. v. PanterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  2. McEachin v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Griffin v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Daniel v. BoykinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  5. Felker v. StillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API