Legal Opinion

Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

California Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1969No. L. A. No. 29660PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

Petitioner1 Albert Conti brings mandamus to compel respondents City of Los Angeles and Board of Civil Service Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles to vacate the proceedings of the board of December 17 and 29, 1965, at which the board sustained the discharge of petitioner as a blacksmith with the Department of Water and Power. Although we reject petitioner’s contention that the board is estopped to dispute his reinstatement, we hold, in accord with the findings of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, that these proceedings denied him procedural due process in that…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Haft v. Lone Palm HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API