Teague v. Hall
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Action to recover damages for deceit. The defendant, Hall, had established citrus nurseries upon two tracts of land held by him under lease. One was known as the Keim nursery and the other as the Yost nursery. On March 28, 1909, the parties entered into a contract whereby Hall sold to Teague all of his interest in these two nurseries in consideration of the sum of thirty-seven thousand dollars, five hundred dollars of this sum to be paid by the conveyance of a certain lot, and the balance to be paid in gold coin in certain installments running over a period of a year and a half or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ruhl v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Dow v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Eichelberger v. Mills Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
- Bank of Woodland v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Maxon-Nowlin Co. v. NorswingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Neff v. EnglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Blackman v. HowesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.