Legal Opinion

Martens v. Martens

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 12, 1941No. 32,918PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice. '

The parties to this suit were married in 1919 and divorced April 22, 1935. By the terms of the decree, defendant was required to pay plaintiff $75 per month as alimony and also reasonable rent for her living quarters. In November 1940 defendant moved for amendment of the decree so as to terminate, or at least to lessen, the alimony and rent provisions, on the grounds that his earnings had decreased and his financial burdens had become more onerous than when the decree was entered, his father having died and left his mother, then 66 years old, in need of his help to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Smith v. Benefit Assn. of Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Haskell v. HaskellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  3. Lindbloom v. LindbloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Quist v. QuistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cermak v. CermakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Garlinger v. GarlingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  3. CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. Sieber v. SieberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Bissell v. BissellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API