Sullivan v. Lumsden
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of tbe Superior Court of San Diego County and. from an order denying a new trial. W. L. Pierce, Judge. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BELCHER, C.
On January 6, 1888, Lillian Cullen commenced an action in tbe superior court of San Diego county against J. C. Sprigg, tbe plaintiffs in this action and others, for tbe partition of lot 1111 of tbe pueblo lands of tbe city of San *666Diego, “as shown and delineated upon tbe official map thereof made by Charles H. Poole, C. E. and IT. S. deputy surveyor, and lmown as the Poole map.” The plaintiffs here did not appear in that action, and their defaults were entered. The case was tried, and the court found that the parties to the action were the owners of certain described portions of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Dunlap v. SteereCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Cullen v. SpriggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Senter v. SenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Smith v. ButlerOregon Supreme Court · 1883
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rappleyea v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Antonsen v. Pacific Container Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.