Legal Opinion

Smith v. Butler

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Polk County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Lord, J.:

This was a suit to correct a mistake in a decree of partition. The mistake originated in the description of a division line in the report of referees, and not being noticed at the time, was confirmed by the court without objection, and incorporated in its decree. The complaint is subject to some criticism for much redundant matter, but no pleading was resorted to to expunge these objectional features in the court below. It does, however, allege facts sufficient to show the mistake, and in what it consisted, and prays the equitable interposition of the court for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Hudson Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fowler v. WoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Sims v. RigginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Brown v. WessonMississippi Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Sullivan v. LumsdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Clark v. SayersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API