Cullen v. Sprigg
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
0.—■ This is an action for partition of pueblo lot No. 1111 of the lands known as the pueblo lands of the city of San Diego.
The appeal is from an interlocutory judgment determining the rights of the parties as to their respective interests in said lot, and from an order denying a new trial.
The rights of the appellants rest upon their deraignment of title from the city of San Diego under a deed from the city, executed October 25, 1869, to James W. Cullen, purporting to convey a tract in the southeastern portion of said lot, specifically described by metes and ■ bounds, and forming…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sherman v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Ruch v. Rock IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Lawrence v. BallouCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Ferris v. CooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Schenk v. EvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sunset Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Augusta Land Co. v. Augusta Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Hawley v. KafitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Atlantic-Pacific Oil Co. v. Gas Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.