Legal Opinion

United States v. Union Pac. R. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1909No. 2,873PublishedCited by 18 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Wyoming.

1Opinion of the Court

ADAMS, Circuit Judge.

This was an action at law instituted by the United States to recover a penalty from the defendant railroad company, a carrier of interstate commerce, for alleged violation of Act Cong. June 29, 1906, 34 Stat. 607, c. 3594 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 918), which prohibits confinement of live stock in cars for more than 28 hours without unloading for rest, water, and feeding. The petition stated facts constituting a cause of action under the statute, and particularly stated that the railroad company confined the live stock “knowingly and willfully.” The answer contained…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  3. Boatmen's Bank v. FritzlenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  5. Hayes-Young Tie Plate Co. v. St. Louis Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rishel v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Little v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. St. Joseph Stockyards Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
  5. Merritt & Chapman Derrick & Wrecking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API