St. Joseph Stockyards Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. Three actions by the United States against the St. Joseph Stockyards Company. Judgments for the United States (181 Fed. 625), and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The writs of error in these cases question three judgments each for a penalty of $100, for the alleged violation of the 28-hour law. Act June 29, 1906, c. 3594, 34 Stat. 607 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 918; Supp. 1909, p. 1178). Juries were waived, and the cases were tried by the court, which made a special finding of the facts, and rendered a judgment against the Stockyards Company in each case.
[1] Counsel for the United States contends that the question whether or not the special findings sustain the judgments cannot be considered in this court, under Rogers v.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- St. Louis v. Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1871
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- United States v. Sioux City Stock Yards Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1908
- New York Cent. & H. R. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Kansas City Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Chicago Great Western R. v. ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Grand Trunk Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.