Legal Opinion

Armour Packing Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 29, 1907No. Nos. 2,471, 2,472, 2,473, 2,474PublishedCited by 107 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. In the statement and. opinion in these cases the Armour Packing Company's case alone will bo treated, because the four cases were tried upon agreed statements, and their facts are so similar that the questions of law they present are identical.

Read the full summary

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. In the statement and. opinion in these cases the Armour Packing Company's case alone will bo treated, because the four cases were tried upon agreed statements, and their facts are so similar that the questions of law they present are identical. The packing company was indicted and tried for, and was convicted of, a violation of the Elkins act to further regulate commerce of February 19, .1903 (chapter 708, 32 Stat. 847 LIT. S. Comp. St. Supp. .1905, p. 5991) in the District Court for the Western District…

1Opinion of the CourtSanborn, Circuit Judge

1. The shipper delivered its goods to the Burlington company, the carrier, obtained its through bill of lading from Kansas City to Christiania, Norway, received its concession, and paid the through rate, less than that named in the tariffs filed and published by the carriers, in the city of Kansas City, in the state of Kansas. By these acts the transportation of this property at this less rate by the Burlington company and its connecting carriers from Kansas City into and through the Western .district of Missouri to New York was ■ caused, but the carriage was conducted by the railroad…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Pettibone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  5. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. United States v. Aubrey Baker Davis, Jr., A/K/A Junior Baker Davis, A/K/A Baker Davis, and Margaret DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Wear v. Imperial Window Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. United States v. Midstate Horticultural Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API