Black v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
After two hearings before a local administrative committee the Board of Bar Governors has found that petitioner misappropriated funds entrusted to his care by a client and wilfully commingled his own funds with those of a client. The board recommends that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for three years.
Petitioner was retained in 1944 by the Friesleben Estate Company, a corporation organized in 1899 and dissolved in 1949. Sometime in mid-1944 petitioner was made a director, and in 1946 secretary-treasurer, of the corporation. In these capacities and as counsel,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Sturr v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Hildebrand v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bruns v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Brawner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- In Re HesslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Vaughn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. KupecWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.