Legal Opinion

Bruns v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1941No. L. A. 17850PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*668THE COURT.

In two separate proceedings instituted before a local administrative committee of The State Bar of California, petitioner was charged with (1) acceptance of a fee from a client upon false assurances that a suit would be filed, misrepresenting to the client that suit had been filed although no legal services of value were performed, and (2) misuse of funds, failure to defend legal actions, -refusal to account for funds received, and other professional misconduct in connection with petitioner’s employment as an attorney by members of a milk producers’ association.

In the first…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marsh v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Marsh v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Waterman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Stanford v. the State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Trusty v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Perrine v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. PhoebusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Clark v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Day v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API