Legal Opinion

Brawner v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1957No. L. A. 23991PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

It was charged that petitioner received a check for $71,862 from the complainant, Mrs. Jones, with instructions to purchase stock and that he delivered securities to her in the amount of $28,013.80 and paid her $10,000, but that he failed to account for the balance of $33,848.20 and appropriated it to his own use. The local administrative committee found that he had not misappropriated any money and stated that the funds retained by petitioner were to be applied as fees for services which he had performed for Mr. and Mrs. Jones. Upon the same evidence the Board of Governors reached…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Furman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hildebrand v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Werner v. the State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Browne v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Lindenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Black v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. McKinney v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API