Legal Opinion
Schilling v. Moore Et Vir.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 14, 1912No. 1767PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County; A. N. Munden, Judge. Action by H. C. Schilling against Mattie J. Moore and Samuel D. Moore. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
AMES, C.
This action was brought for the specific performance of the following contract:
“Capitol Hill, Okla., December 21, 1908. We, the undersigned, this day appoint H. C. Schilling, or his assignees, exclusive agent for a period of twelve months, to sell and dispose of lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 38, 39, 40, 41 and 42, in block 35, Schilling’s addition, supplemental plat, to Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and we agree to deliver, a warranty deed for the same at the rate of $150.00 per each lot, or its portion, at his request, at any time without delay, and that the said H. C. Schilling agrees to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Superior Oil & Gas Co. v. MehlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Atwood v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Emmerson v. BotkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Cloe v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fretz v. City of EdmondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Wray v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Okmulgee Producing & Refining Co. v. BaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- McKellop v. DewitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Lusk v. Porter, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.