Fretz v. City of Edmond
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. 'Clark, Judge. Action by Aaron Fretz against the City of Edmond, and its officers for an injunction. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the petition, the plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
BURFORD, C.
The original petition in this cause contained three separate causes of action. In this court it is conceded that the matters contained in the second and third cause of action have become moot; and have been therefore abandoned by the plaintiff in error, leaving for our consideration only the ruling upon the first cause of action alleged. This part of the petition sets out- that the plaintiff is and lias 'been for a number of years last past a citizen, property owner, and resident taxpayer of the city of Edmond, Okla.; that the oity of Edmond is a city of the first class;…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Interstate Com. Commiss. v. B. & O. RAILROADSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Call Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cartwright v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Barnes Laundry Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- City of Shawnee v. RoushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Lawrence v. SchellstedeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- City of Oklahoma City v. HokeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.