Legal Opinion
McKellop v. Dewitz
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 12, 1914No. 3561PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Error from District Court, Muskogee County; R. P. de Graffenried, Judge. Action by A. A. McKellop and wife against P. W. H. Dewitz and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
GALBRAITPI, C.
The one question presented by ■this appeal is whether or not a written contract created an agency in the defendant in error, P. W. H. Dewitz, coupled with an interest in the property therein described. The contract is as follows:
“This agreement, made and entered into this 18th day of January, 1909, by and between A. A. McKellop and Myrtle McKellop, his wife, of Muskogee, Oklahoma, parties of the'first .part, and P. W. H. Dewitz, of the same place, party of the second part, witnesseth: That, whereas, the said parties of the first part are the owners of the following…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Hicks v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Cloe v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Taylor v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Kimmell v. PowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. TackettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Todd v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Hopkins v. StitesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Spencer Co-operative Live Stock Shipping Ass'n v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- McFadden v. CrislerTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.