Legal Opinion

City of Sacramento v. California State Legislature

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1986No. Civ. 25620PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, J.

The City of Sacramento (City) appeals from a judgment dismissing the Legislature from an action in which it seeks to compel the Legislature to appropriate money. Its purpose is to secure a reimbursement, pursuant to article XIII B, section 6 of the California Constitution, of costs it expended in compliance with a state-mandated unemployment insurance program. We will affirm the judgment (order of dismissal) on the ground that the judiciary has no power, under the doctrine of separation of powers, to grant such relief.

Facts and Procedural Background

The circumstances giving…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. People ex rel. McCauley & Tevis v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Mandel v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. City of Sacramento v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. County of San Diego v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Board of Administration v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. California Association for Safety Education v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. In Re Attorney Discipline SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API