Legal Opinion
Board of Administration v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 1997No. C020118PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
This litigation arises from changes in the way the Legislature has funded the California Public Employees’ Retirement Fund (PERF). Until 1990, the state paid employer contributions to the PERF on a monthly basis. In 1990, the Legislature changed the payment schedule from monthly to quarterly. In 1991, the Legislature temporarily changed the payment schedule from quarterly to semiannually for one year only. Legislation in 1992 changed the schedule to “semiannually, six months in arrears.” Legislation in 1993 changed the schedule to “annually, 12 months in arrears.”…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Lexin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Retired Employees Ass'n of Orange County, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Retirement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.