Legal Opinion

City of Sacramento v. State of California

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1990No. S006188PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*57Opinion

EAGLESON, J.

In response to changes in federal law, chapter 2 of the Statutes of 1978 (hereafter chapter 2/78) extended mandatory coverage under the state’s unemployment insurance law to include state and local governments and nonprofit corporations. Here we consider whether, in chapter 2/78, the state “mandate[d] a new program or higher level of service” on the local agencies, and must therefore reimburse local compliance costs under article XIII B of the California Constitution and related statutes.

We conclude that the state is not required to reimburse the chapter 2/78 expenses of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Arcadia Unified School District v. State Department of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Durant v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1997

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API