City of Sacramento v. State of California
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*57Opinion
EAGLESON, J.
In response to changes in federal law, chapter 2 of the Statutes of 1978 (hereafter chapter 2/78) extended mandatory coverage under the state’s unemployment insurance law to include state and local governments and nonprofit corporations. Here we consider whether, in chapter 2/78, the state “mandate[d] a new program or higher level of service” on the local agencies, and must therefore reimburse local compliance costs under article XIII B of the California Constitution and related statutes.
We conclude that the state is not required to reimburse the chapter 2/78 expenses of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Arcadia Unified School District v. State Department of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Durant v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.