Legal Opinion

In Re Attorney Discipline System

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1998No. S073756PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

C. J. On October 14,1998, this court issued an order soliciting public comment in response to a letter submitted to the court by Governor Pete Wilson and a “Request for a Special Regulatory Assessment” submitted by the State Bar of California.

In his letter, the Governor acknowledged that a problem with public protection had arisen because the State Bar’s disciplinary system no longer was operating effectively, observed that “[c]learly, the Court has inherent power over the discipline of attorneys,” and requested that this court assume responsibility over the attorney…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Keller v. State Bar of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Kasler v. LockyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Warden v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Carmel Valley Fire Protection District v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API