Legal Opinion
Guillemin v. Stein
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 9, 2002No. C039535PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, Acting P. J.
Richard L. Guillemin purports to appeal from the
judgment of dismissal of his cross-complaint that the trial court entered after sustaining the demurrer of Paul Stein and Ray Waller to the only counts of the pleading naming them as cross-defendants. He also appeals from two postjudgment orders awarding costs and sanctions. We shall dismiss the appeal from the judgment and from an award of discovery sanctions as untimely. We shall affirm the award of costs, but will vacate the associated sanctions. In doing so, we construe Government Code section 6103.5 as authorizing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Bucur v. AhmadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Peake v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Martorana v. Marlin & SaltzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Day v. CollingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.