Legal Opinion

Kaufman & Broad Communities, Inc. v. Performance Plastering, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 2005No. C049391PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*29Opinion

SIMS, J.

Pursuant to rule 22(a) of the California Rules of Court, appellant Performance Plastering, Inc., has moved this court to take judicial notice of various documents that, in the view of appellant, constitute cognizable legislative history of a 1998 amendment to Revenue and Taxation Code section 19719 (Assembly Bill No. 1950 (1997-1998 Reg. Sess.) (Assem. Bill No. 1950)). (Stats. 1998, ch. 856, § 2.)

I

Legislative History Generally

Before turning to the specifics of appellant’s request for judicial notice, we have some general comments about requests for judicial notice of…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Cortez v. Purolator Air Filtration Products Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. North Bay Regional Center v. MaldonadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Department of Forestry & Fire ProtectionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Teselle v. McLoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Alki Partners, LP v. DB Fund Services, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API