Legal Opinion
Bucur v. Ahmad
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 2016No. D068689PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PRAGER, J. *
Viorel Bucur (Bucur) and Lacramiora Bucur, husband and wife (together, Appellants), owned two long-distance trucking companies that contracted with FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (FedEx), to provide line-haul (long-distance trucking) services. Mirza Shamim Ahmad was employed by FedEx as a senior line-haul manager.
This case represents Appellants’ fifth unsuccessful attempt to recoup damages arising out of FedEx’s termination of their line-haul contracts. They appeal from a superior court judgment granting judgment on the pleadings and awarding sanctions under Code of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Thurman v. Bayshore Transit Management, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Cal Sierra Dev., Inc. v. George Reed, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- J.B.B. Inv. Partners Ltd. v. Fair, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Ponce v. Wells Fargo Bank, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Colombo v. Kinkle, Rodiger & Spriggs, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Cal Sierra Development v. George Reed, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.