In re Spitzer
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding against respondent Richard C. Spitzer, a member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals,1 the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended to this court that reciprocal, but *1138not identical, sanctions be imposed and that respondent be suspended for thirty days and any reinstatement be subject to respondent demonstrating fitness and showing that, he has refunded the unearned $1,500 retainer noted in the Maryland case. No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed. The text of the Report and Recommendation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.