Legal Opinion

In re Spitzer

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 2004No. 02-BG-69Published

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary proceeding against respondent Richard C. Spitzer, a member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals,1 the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended to this court that reciprocal, but *1138not identical, sanctions be imposed and that respondent be suspended for thirty days and any reinstatement be subject to respondent demonstrating fitness and showing that, he has refunded the unearned $1,500 retainer noted in the Maryland case. No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed. The text of the Report and Recommendation…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API