Legal Opinion

James v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 1980No. 77-6474, CA 14647PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, J.

In this workers’ compensation case claimant seeks compensation for emotional disability. The referee held that claimant’s claim for anxiety reaction resulting from work caused stress was compensable. The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed and SAIF appeals. The claim was made for benefits for an occupational disease, ORS 656.802 to 656.824. The State Accident Insurance Fund (SAIF) argues that claimant’s disability did not arise from the conditions of her employment because the job stress she encountered was no more than that faced by the average worker and that her employment did not cause…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Coday v. WILLAMETTE TUG & BARGE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. School District No. 1 v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Swiss Colony, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Clayton v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Compensation of Korter v. EBI Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Compensation of Shilling v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API