Legal Opinion

Beaudry v. Winchester Plywood Company

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1970PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Claimant contends he incurred a compensable occupational disease during the course of his employment. His claim was denied by his direct responsibility employer and its insurance company, who are the de*507fendants. Claimant requested a hearing on his rejected claim. Pursuant to such hearing, an order was entered by the hearing officer of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, holding that claimant had incurred a compensable occupational disease and directing the employer to begin the payment of compensation.

The order of the hearing officer was rejected by the defendants in accordance with ORS…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Claim of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Giambattista v. Thomas A. EdisonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. White v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. National Zinc Company v. HainlineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  5. Kinney v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. James v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. GygiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. Dethlefs v. Hyster Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Mathis v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API