Legal Opinion

State v. Carlisle

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1975No. 748SC980PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

Defendant has brought forward eighty-four exceptions and five assignments of error for our consideration.

In his first argument defendant asserts, that the trial court erred when it denied his motions for nonsuit on the charge of a sixth offense of driving under the influence. In support of his argument defendant cites statements made by Trooper Perkins to the effect that defendant’s faculties were not impaired when *25he was stopped. Of course, mere contradictions and discrepancies in the State’s evidence are not enough to warrant the granting of a motion for nonsuit. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Arnold Lowe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. SykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Church v. Powell, Comr. of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Stalls v. PennyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. CarlisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API