Stalls v. Penny
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
In reversing the order suspending petitioner’s driving privileges, the trial judge concluded that petitioner’s arrest was unconstitutional for the reason that his statement that he was driving the car was elicited by the officer before he was advised of his Miranda rights. The propriety of this conclusion is the decisive question presented by this appeal. Before addressing it, a recital of some of the legal principles that apply to accident investigations by police officers is in order.
“One who is detained by police officers under a charge of driving while under the influence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arnold Lowe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. SykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. ClaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nagem v. City of Phenix CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
- State v. AlmondCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
- State v. SeagleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989