Legal Opinion
Arnold Lowe v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 25, 1969No. 22044PublishedCited by 121 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:
Appellant was convicted of a violation of the Dyer Act and appeals.
THE QUESTION
The appellant contends that unconstitutionally obtained statements made by him, were used against him at his trial. There is no disagreement as to the facts surrounding the questioning of the appellant by an Arizona Deputy Sheriff; the four-fold warnings set forth in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966) were not given. Therefore, the questions for this court to determine are: (1) whether appellant was in “custody or otherwise deprived…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden v. William Eugene PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by121 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Donald Gene BoothCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Harper v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- United States v. Glenn W. HallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Enrique Ortiz Cervantes v. Bill Walker, Superintendent, Banning Road CampCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.