State v. Lawson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Defendant first asserts that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence incriminating statements made by defendant to the investigating officer at the scene of the accident.
Defendant was arrested for public drunkenness by Patrolman Askew and placed in the patrol car. He was then advised of his constitutional rights as required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 16 L.Ed. 2d 694, 86 S.Ct. 1602 (1966), and questioned by the patrolman. Among his other rights, defendant was advised that he had the right to an attorney and that he could call an attorney when he arrived at the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Arnold Lowe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Alfred Earl HarflingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BrennanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- State v. FieldsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. VargusSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- State v. ConnleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.