Church v. Powell, Comr. of Motor Vehicles
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
The judgment is not supported by either the evidence, which is uncontradicted, or the applicable law. In the first place, it is not necessary to reach the question of whether the patrolman should have advised petitioner of his Miranda rights before asking if his name was Morris Church and whether he was the owner and operator of the wrecked car. In the hearing we are now called upon to review, the testimony that petitioner told the patrolman that he had been driving the car at the time of the wreck not only came without objection, it came voluntarily from the lips of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. SykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. TyndallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. CarlisleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- Steinkrause v. TatumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Richardson v. HiattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Stalls v. PennyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- McDowell v. TatumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007